Here is a talk I gave at the New York C.S. Lewis Society on January 10th, about The Fall of Arthur and an imaginary, composite, Inklings Arthuriad:
Here is a summary of the talk:
Arthurian Geographies in Tolkien, Williams and Lewis
by Sørina Higgins
The recent publication of The Fall of Arthur, an unfinished poem by J.R.R. Tolkien, revealed a startling, previously-unknown aspect of Tolkien’s legendarium. The key is found in notes Tolkien left about how he intended the fragmentary Fall of Arthur to continue and how the story could have connected up to the larger Legendarium. The most surprising are that Tolkien intended Lancelot to function somewhat like Eärendel, sailing into the West to seek a lost paradise, and that he originally associated Avalon with the undying lands. These connections enable an imaginative reader to speculate that if Tolkien had finished The Fall of Arthur, he could have woven it together with The Silmarillion so that his elvish history mapped onto the legends of Arthur, forming the mythological and linguistic foundation on which “real” English history and language were based. In addition, he could have collaborated with C.S. Lewis and Charles Williams on their Arthurian legends, creating a totalizing myth greater than any they wrote individually.
In all three writers’ worlds, evil is in the East; this is not surprising in an England threatened by Nazi Germany (and many other “eastern” invasions throughout its history). God’s country is in the opposite direction, across the sea, connected with ancient legends about Hesperus, the evening star, Venus, the light in the West, and magical islands out in the sea. In all three writers’ worlds, heroic characters achieve a great quest and leave this earthly realm for a heavenly one, attaining a spiritual fulfillment that has both historical and personal implications for England and for the individual Christian.
But what happens if we try to put these three writers’ Arthurian works together? We find problems with the astronomy and cosmology. There is a contradiction about what happened to Arthur. All three have contemporary heirs of Arthur who are still alive in 20th-century England. All three are about a kind of secret tradition passed on. Merlin plays a variety of roles in each, and each uses differing sacred objects.
Of course, we cannot examine a work of literature that does not exist. There is no Legend of King Arthur by Lewis, Tolkien, and Williams. Yet certain texts do exist: The Fall of Arthur, all of Tolkien’s drafts and notebooks, Lewis’s “Launcelot” fragment, and all of their published works, and it is useful to compare them and consider their implications.